Related topics

md5 and large files
Joseph sys...@interbaun.com linux gentoo user Is anybody getting the same message: Calculating world dependencies /!!! Digest verification failed: !!! /usr/portage/x11-apps/xinit/xinit-1.0.4.ebuild !!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification !!! Got: 7ae3e7a071d5e4be0dcc383be0296cd4 !

Digest verification Failed
The helper process checks the user id of the calling process, and allows verification of password for that account (so f.ex. screen saver processes could be Some modern Unix password systems allow the MD5 algorithm used in stead of the old DES. MD5 is a message-digest algorithm, ie it produces a fixed-length,

Verification of SP-1
(The converse is also almost always true: any given MD5 sum can be produced by only one string. Coincidentally, this is why MD5 is used for file verification and the like.) What this means is that if crypt() and md5() give different outputs, then you know that one of them is not intended to generate MD5 sums.

Java Installation: failed on MD5 verification
Daniel dragonhe...@gentoo.org linux gentoo user Delete the file /usr/portage/distfiles/attr-2.4.19.src.tar.gz and try again. You may need to recreate its digest as before. If that fails lodge a bug at bugs.gentoo.org -- Daniel Black <dragonhe...@gentoo.org> --

failed on MD5 verification
I have everything configured correctly on the postfix side it would appear (I see the 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN OTP DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 and 250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN .... SASL authentication failure: Password verification failed May 28 13:51:01 industry postfix/smtpd[20191]: warning: localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]: SASL

First part of TCP-MD5 inbound verification
Before sending the stream, the client calculate the stream's MD5, and send it to the server, 2. The client send the stream, 3. The server receive the MD5 4. The server receive the stream 5. The server compute the MD5 algorithm with the received stream and compare it with the MD5 received. If they are identically,

.md5 file?
drumstik r...@127.0.0.1 comp os linux On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 21:08:49 GMT, drumstik <r...@127.0.0.1> wrote: On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 15:16:09 -0500, "ExTiNcT_|D_|E_|M_|O_|N" <z...@localhost.com> wrote: $SOURCE = $1; $TARGET = $2; should read: SOURCE = $1; TARGET = $2; I'm sure those arent the only problems though -- drumstik

sDMBc - mkw question
Log says: Dec 8 17:11:05 menek clamd[6570]: MD5 verification error After running freshclam manually everything went good and I had to start clamd. Seems like there was really some problem with MD5 sums but this should not cause clamd to die, as this not only makes it unusable but also may give further problems for

Hashed PW's more secure than encrypted PW's?
Yeah, whatever Intefering with memory buffers causes the kernel to delete the program, Key is sent over VPN, tampering with the kernel causes the MD5 hash But since it's been tampered with, how do you know it sends the trust now-incorrect MD5 sum, instead of a copy of the original MD5 sum? and key isn't sent,

? Howto file copy with md5 verification?
Pine's SMTP AUTH client code supports CRAM-MD5, PLAIN, and LOGIN by default, none of which use certificates. Consequently, the following statement of yours: When disable-some-authenticators is empty, the SMTP AUTH server returns a NO to the certificate verification. makes no sense. The client based certificates for

beginner question on pgp vs. md5 verification
Clement \"nodens\" Hermann clement.herm...@free.fr linux debian maint dpkg Now that I'ma bit more comfortable with debian, I come back to my old idea :) More than md5 information (I agree, I can have that with debsums), rpm keeps informations about rights, ownership, and modification date of files (except file

mtree verification output format
Then transmit the login and the md5 encrypted. The server sees the login, encrypt with md5() the login+password it has in its database and compare the two md5 An attacker only has to tap into the connection and save the md5 hash that the client transmits. From there on he can simply retransmit it and pretend to

MD5 and file verification accuracy?
Daniel Pielmeier daniel.pielme...@googlemail.com linux gentoo user Joseph schrieb: Is anybody getting the same message: Calculating world dependencies /!!! Digest verification failed: !!! /usr/portage/x11-apps/xinit/xinit-1.0.4.ebuild !!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification !!! Got: 7ae3e7a071d5e4be0dcc383be0296cd4

Bug#231537: debsums: [PATCH] Support verification of prelinked ...
The MD5 checksum immediately above it from a third-party site (which I won't name). I got curious, so I re-downloaded from the MICROSOFT server, and here is the checksum from that: ECF625F6563DFCAEEECC4B1481899D4B ...which DOES agree with yours. Oh my oh my, it appears that some third-party sites have a DIFFERENT

postfix + sasl2 + pam
Alan MacDonald alan.macdon...@brunel.ac.uk sci crypt In article <5u2ov4$nhv$1@falcon. pacit.tas.gov.au> Roger Fleming, ro...@police.tas.gov.au writes: That's exactly my problem, and why I gave that little definition; I don't think you can say a variable is finite if it is unbounded. Obviously it's true that there

Problem with SHN files
Geoff King gk...@evildomain.dyndns.org alt os linux gentoo On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:28:43 +0000, S wrote: What can I do to make the portage system accept my intentional modification of an ebuild script? rebuild the digest for the ebuild. ebuild xorg-x11-6.8.2-r1 digest -- On a clear disk you can seek forever.

MD5 and file verification accuracy?
Preferably, it would allow the md5 to be useful for verification without renaming the files, but barring that, how about mass-renaming of files? ah well, just glad to be listening to new music right now. you can use Irfan view to rename files in batch, or you can open the md5 in notepad and just change all the file

verification d'un cdrom grave avec cdrecord
But even when I let smtpd run 'normally', I get an error: postfix/smtpd[15269]: warning: SASL authentication failure: Password verification failed postfix/smtpd[15269]: is enabled: 250-AUTH NTLM LOGIN PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 250-AUTH=NTLM LOGIN PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 I got a user 'test' with passwd 'test';

How to MODIFY ebuild not to "FAIL ON MD5 verification" ??
Boris Gjenero enosys_at_yahoo_dot_...@no.spam.ca comp infosystems www servers ms-windows Well, you did a certain "verification" and it passed. Of course if someone could give you an altered Apache distribution file (say with a trojan, virus or whatever) they can also give you a matching MD5 file so you think

ATTN: Furthur Net Users
Barney Wolff bar...@databus.com mailing freebsd net Just a note that, as discussion on nanog shows, it's very important to only do the md5 check if the incoming packet is going to be accepted and processed, rather than the intuitive order of checking the sig first. That's because checking first allows an easy DoS,